From the Library: covers, censuses, and editions, documented. Browse the Library →
SOJ Vagrant Story · The Cutting Room
← Back to the Library

What was cut from Vagrant Story?

More than half the story stayed on the cutting-room floor, and the partner Ashley was meant to have went with it.

The source for this page is unusually direct: an interview with Yasumi Matsuno printed in the game’s own E3 2000 giveaway comic, where he itemises the damage himself. Due to capacity and development time, he says, over half of the game’s scenario had to be cut. With it went game elements, largest of them the computer-controlled partners who were meant to support Ashley in the middle of the story, removed because the PlayStation’s memory would not hold them alongside everything else. The maps, too, were drawn richer than they shipped: polygon counts per map were reduced to keep the frame rate honest.

That record also settles the question players ask most about the missing material. The documented partner plan was for AI companions, characters run by the machine fighting beside a solo player. No two-player or co-operative mode appears in the interview record, the manuals, or the game’s credits, and this page reports that plainly rather than repeat the multiplayer version of the rumour: the co-op-shaped hole in Vagrant Story is real, but the second controller was never the plan on paper.

The cuts explain the finished game’s strange shape. What survived is a five-to-six-hour core that calls itself a prelude and ends by announcing a larger story, front-loaded with a murder mystery whose culprits’ war was mostly written out. And some of the ambition was rerouted rather than deleted: a New Game Plus structure that carries your arsenal into a second run and opens the sealed Blood-Sin doors, down into the depths of the Iron Maiden, is where the game put the content it could afford to keep.

THE INTERVIEW RECORD

In the director’s own accounting
Over half the scenario
Matsuno’s figure, given in the E3 comic interview and repeated in the development record: capacity and development time together cost the game the majority of its written story.
The partners
AI-controlled supporting characters were designed to join Ashley partway through the game. Memory restrictions removed them, leaving Callo Merlose an observer and the Riskbreaker doctrine of working alone conveniently intact.
The maps
Early maps carried more polygons for more elaborate spaces. Processing speed won; the shipped city is the leaner draft of a richer one.
The interface too
Memory pressure reached the presentation layer: the team adjusted the interface, the texture mapping and the polygon meshes of the maps to fit the whole into the machine.

WHAT PLAYERS ASK

The rumour, audited
Was there multiplayer?
Not in any source opened for this page. The partner system was single-player, run by the AI. The rumour likely grows from the partner plan itself, retold one step too far.
Does the cut half survive anywhere?
In outline, yes: the game’s frame presents itself as a prelude to the story of the wanderer, and Matsuno later reused concepts from an unused sequel in Final Fantasy XIV’s Save the Queen. The scenario text itself has never been published.
More from the Library
MORE FROM THE VAGRANT STORY ARCHIVE →
One shelf of the Library. Browse them all →

THE FIRST WORD

New pages and new pieces, first.